Friday, May 22, 2015

What is the IRS thinking about when it announces that plan sponsors, even those using a qualified TPA/recordkeeper, should maintain the records for hardship distributions and participant loans?

401(k) plans particularly (although this applies to other types of qualified plans that permit participant loans) have been marketed and promoted to would-be participants as flexible retirement saving arrangements – so flexible that you can take your money back out without a problem either by borrowing it or by taking a hardship distribution. Depending on your perspective, this flexibility may be anathema to the notion of retirement savings, i.e., long-term savings and investing.   America’s 401(k) saving structure is, in this respect, more “flexible” than arrangements in most other countries that have similar plan structures. The unfortunate result of this sort of flexibility is “leakage” – about which officials at Treasury and Labor seem concerned.

So, to beg the obvious question, did the IRS issue this “reminder” to plan sponsors because of its disdain for leakage? In view of the fact that the pronouncement tends to ignore how most 401(k) plans actually operate, one might certainly come to that conclusion.

The IRS says that, for hardship distributions, the plan sponsor (not its TPA) should retain these records in paper or electronic format:

  • Documentation of the hardship request, review and approvalThinkstockPhotos-468601351
  • Financial information and documentation that substantiates the employee’s immediate and heavy financial need
  • Documentation to support that the hardship distribution was properly made in accordance with the applicable plan provisions and the Internal Revenue Code
    • Proof of the actual distribution made and related Forms 1099-R

Fidelity came out of the box swinging. In a public reaction to the pronouncement on hardship distribution record requirements, Fidelity begins by saying, “Fidelity offers a hardship withdrawal distribution procedure that does not require that a participant submit supporting documentation.” Fidelity then describes how its electronic system works and how it is compliant with the law. Fidelity also criticizes gaps in the law. And well it should since the guidance out there makes electronic processing of hardship distributions as described by Fidelity proper. But, of course, this begs other questions – shouldn’t the plan sponsor be able to rely on Fidelity and the other capable recordkeepers, and do plan sponsors really have to have all of the documentation the IRS describes?

On the participant loan front, the IRS states that the plan sponsor “should” retain these records either on paper or electronically:

  • Evidence of the loan application, review and approval process
  • An executed plan loan note
  • If applicable, documentation verifying that the loan proceeds were used to purchase or construct a primary residence
  • Evidence of loan repayments
    • Evidence of collection activities associated with loans in default and the related Forms 1099-R, if applicable

There are some other documentary requirements if the participant seeks a loan “in excess of five years” (hmm, not “within” five years) for the purchase or construction of a primary residence.

In an effort to honor the flexibility that Congress has granted to 401(k) plans, plan loan processes are mostly electronic and are designed to follow the requirements of Code section 72(p) without the complexity of all of the now seemingly required documentation. Of course, evidence of an obligation to pay can take a form other than a plan loan note, and most e-systems do not automatically generate a note, but instead, a note may be generated if desired by the participant.

The IRS in the recent past has been pushing for plans to utilize good internal controls. Apparently, reliance on your TPA no matter how competent and no matter how good its systems is not a satisfactory internal control and is inadequate when it comes to leakage. Let’s assume that this required documentation is plan documentation and that the plan sponsor is obligated to maintain it without reliance on a recordkeeper. So, what’s a plan sponsor to do?

At the present time, it may be impossible for many recordkeepers to “transfer” the hardship and loan documentation in electronic format to the plan sponsor. But every plan sponsor should probably request it from the recordkeeper and request that the electronic data be transmitted to the plan sponsor with each future hardship distribution and each participant loan. And, then, of course, there’s the fiduciary obligation to review the information and make certain of compliance with the rules since the plan sponsor may not be able to rely on the recordkeeper to do that. And failing or refusing to do this, maybe the IRS’s real objective will be met – the plan will be amended to eliminate participant loans and hardship distributions in order to avoid leakage.


Friday, May 8, 2015

If you are responsible for administering your company’s Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) policy, you know that the associated FMLA forms can be both your best friend and your worst nightmare. On the one hand, proper use of the […]

Thursday, May 7, 2015

The Department of Labor (“DOL“) has responded to the concerns of the broker-dealer community as expressed in myriad comment letters concerning the 2010 proposed fiduciary regulations by adding the Best Interest Contract (BIC) exemption to the new proposed rule. The […]

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

How many of you remember the classic children’s’ story “Are you My Mother?” by P.D. Eastman?  In that delightful story, we follow a confused but determined baby bird who is looking for his mother.  He sets off to find her, […]

Friday, May 1, 2015

Unlike the 1967 film, Cool Hand Luke, where the prison warden delivers the above line shortly after giving a beating to prisoner Luke (Paul Newman) for making a sarcastic remark, employers may be worried about a beating from the IRS […]

Monday, April 20, 2015

On the eve of the March 27, 2015 effective date for the DOL’s final rule amending the definition of “spouse” under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), a Texas district court preliminarily enjoined the rule’s application to the […]

Friday, April 17, 2015

Acting on reaction to a proposed and subsequently withdrawn regulation from October 2010 and attempting to address concerns expressed by both interested parties to the initial proposed regulation and an economic analysis by the Council of Economic Advisors (that the […]

Thursday, April 16, 2015

On April 16, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “EEOC”) finally gave a peek into its thinking about what constitutes a “voluntary” wellness program under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”). Recall that, while there are extensive wellness rules […]

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

In response to comments from the employee benefits community, the IRS has issued two updates in quick succession for the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS). The new procedures – Rev. Proc. 2015-27 and Rev. Proc. 2015-28 – do not […]

Thursday, April 9, 2015

Companies should be aware that at least some major accounting firms are questioning whether discretionary aspects of clawback policies trigger variable accounting for compensatory equity awards granted by those companies. Existing accounting guidance (ASC 718-10-30-24) would seem to suggest that […]