LATEST POST
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Written by and in: General

Illinois Welcome Sign

Earlier this month, Illinois became the first State to enact legislation that requires private-sector employers who do not offer qualified retirement plans to enroll their employees in individual retirement accounts (i.e., “IRAs”). Now-former Governor Pat Quinn signed the Illinois Secure Choice Savings Program Act (“Act”) into law on January 4, 2015.

The Act, which will become effective with enrollment occurring sometime in the next 24 months, has a broad reach. The following provides a high-level summary of the applicability of (and requirements under) the Act:

What Employers are Subject to the Act?

For any given year, the Act applies to any employer that:

  • Is a private for-profit or non-for-profit company engaged in business in Illinois;
  • Has been in business for at least two years;
  • Has employed at least 25 employees in Illinois at all times during the previous calendar year; and
  • Has not offered a qualified retirement plan (for example, a 401(k) or 403(b) plan) in the preceding two years.

An employer with fewer than 25 employees and/or that has been in business for less than two years may, but is not required to, participate in the program.

What Does the Act Require?

A private-sector employer that meets the above criteria will be required to either (i) set up a retirement plan for its employees, or (ii) automatically enroll its employees who are age 18 and older in the savings program created by the Act and set up payroll deductions for them to make deposits into the program.

The program itself will be established and administered by a seven-member board (“Board”) established by the Act. Employee accounts under the program will be set as Roth IRAs under Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) section 408A (i.e., an after-tax IRA).

The payroll deduction amount is set at a default 3% of the employee’s “wages” (generally, the amount shown in box 10 of Form W-2 (wages, tips, other compensation), less amount properly shown in box 14 (nonqualified plans)).

Employees may select a payroll deduction amount higher or lower than 3% (subject to the deduction limits under Code section 219(b)(1)(A)) or, alternatively, opt-out of the program entirely. An employee who opts out may later enroll in the program during the applicable open enrollment period (to be set by the employer). An employee’s account will be portable from one employer to another.

When Will Compliance Be Required?

The legislation includes a 24-month implementation period following its adoption (i.e., an employer may not be required to comply until 2017). During this pre-implementation window, the Board is required to seek an opinion/ruling of the IRS and the Department of Labor regarding the applicability of the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) to the program. The program may be derailed – and never implemented – if it is determined that the IRA arrangements offered under the program will fail to qualify for the favorable federal income tax treatment ordinarily accorded to IRAs under the Code or it is determined that the program is an employee benefit plan under ERISA.

Assuming these federal hurdles can be overcome, then once the Board opens the program for enrollment, an employer will have up to nine months to establish the required payroll deduction program.

What is the Penalty for Failing to Comply?

An employer that fails to enroll an employee in the program as required by the Act may be hit by a penalty of $250 per employee for each calendar year (or portion thereof) that the employee was not enrolled in (and did not opt-out of) the program. For any calendar year beginning after an initial penalty has been assessed, an increased $500 penalty may be assessed for any portion of that calendar year during which the employee remains unenrolled in (or has not otherwise opted out) of the program.

RECENT POSTS
Thursday, January 1, 2015

Happy New Year! As part of our annual tradition in helping retirement plan fiduciaries get started down the right path in the new year, we’re pleased to present our Top Ten New Year’s Countdown. But, wait, what’s better than a […]

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

What is a plan administrator’s obligation under ERISA to seek and obtain information potentially relevant to a participant claim where the participant has not provided it? The Fourth Circuit recently provided guidance on that issue in the case of Harrison […]

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Back in 2010, the ACA enacted a new rule prohibiting insured group health plans from “discriminating” (on the basis of eligibility or provision of benefits) in favor of highly compensated individuals (called “HCIs”). This rule generally became effective January 1, […]

Tuesday, December 16, 2014

Just before Thanksgiving, the IRS issued final regulations on the individual mandate under the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). The individual mandate requires individuals to maintain health insurance (i.e., “minimum essential coverage”) or pay a penalty. The regulations adopt in part, […]

Thursday, December 4, 2014

What, you may ask? That’s right. It no longer works to reimburse employees for the purchase of an individual health insurance policy. I know, many of you have always done this. Well, not any longer under guidance issued under the […]

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

In Notice 2014-74, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued amendments to the safe harbor eligible rollover distribution notices – one of which describes the rollover options available to distributions from non-Roth accounts and the other of which describes the rollover […]

Monday, November 10, 2014

Open enrollment has likely begun at your company, often bringing it with changes to employee health plans. When communicating benefits-related information, it is important to ensure that all employees – including those currently away from the workplace on FMLA leave […]

Thursday, November 6, 2014

I have a friend who has lived in St. Louis with his same-sex partner for years. About a year ago, we were discussing same-sex marriage rights and my friend expressed his hope that Missouri would NOT join the other states […]

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

On October 24th, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and the Department of Labor (“DOL”) offered guidance on the use of a series of target date funds (“TDFs”) in defined contribution plans that would include investment in deferred annuities in the […]