Author Archives: Jeffrey Russell

Keeping Your (Top) Hat On

“Top hat” plans are plans employers maintain for a “select group of management or highly compensated employees.” These plans are exempt from many of ERISA’s protections, including eligibility, vesting, fiduciary responsibility and funding. Thus, they are often used to provide […]

Posted in ERISA Litigation, Executive Compensation, Legal Updates | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

SCOTUS Meant What It Said & Said What It Meant: Dudenhoeffer Imposes Higher Pleading Standards

In a rebuke to the Ninth Circuit, the Supreme Court granted the Amgen defendants’ petition for certiorari, reversed the Ninth Circuit’s judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with its opinion in the district court. The unanimous per […]

Posted in ERISA Litigation, Legal Updates, Qualified Plans, Tax-qualified Retirement Plans | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Moench Presumption is Dead – Long Live the Dudenhoeffer Presumption

On June 25, 2014, a unanimous United States Supreme Court weighed in on the legal standards applicable in stock drop cases in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer. Facts. Beginning in 2007, Fifth Third Bank began experiencing a large number of […]

Posted in Commentary/Opinions/Views, ERISA Litigation, Fiduciary Issues, Legal Updates, Qualified Plans, Securities Law Implications, Tax-qualified Retirement Plans | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Autism Spectrum Disorder and ABA Treatment – New Legal Theories Facing Self-Insured Plans?

Federal law governing mental health benefits is giving rise to a new wave of lawsuits against self-insured ERISA welfare benefit plans.  Plan sponsors should carefully consider their current scope of coverage to avoid litigation risk and ensure fair benefits for […]

Posted in ERISA Litigation, Health Plans | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Sound of Silence: SCOTUS To Review Rules Governing Vesting of Retiree Health Benefits under CBAs

The Supreme Court has granted review in a case that will resolve a long-standing circuit split concerning the vesting of retiree health care benefits.  On May 5th, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of M&G Polymers USA, LLC […]

Posted in ERISA Litigation, Health Plans, Legal Updates | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Lessons to be Learned From a Flawed 401(k) Fee Study (Part 2)

In our prior post, we detailed some significant deficiencies in the study that Yale Law School Professor Ayers is planning to release and the far less threatening Yale official response.  But what steps, if any, should plan administrators take now […]

Posted in Commentary/Opinions/Views, Plan Administration and Compliance, Qualified Plans, Tax-qualified Retirement Plans | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Lessons to be Learned From a Flawed 401(k) Fee Study (Part 1)

Typically, academics do research and then write about their findings and conclusions.  However, as has been reported elsewhere, Professor Ian Ayers, the William K. Townsend Professor at Yale Law School, decided to take his findings and conclusions a step further.  […]

Posted in Commentary/Opinions/Views, Plan Administration and Compliance, Qualified Plans, Tax-qualified Retirement Plans | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Collective Bargaining Agreements: Creating Vested Retiree Medical Benefits

Following its December 22, 2011, ruling we discussed previously that retired Kelsey-Hayes (“Company”) union members must arbitrate their claims for fully-paid lifetime retiree medical benefits, the Eastern District of Michigan handed a victory to different class of union retirees facing […]

Posted in ERISA Litigation, Health Plans, Legal Updates | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Supreme Court to Hear Case on Accrual of Causes of Action Under ERISA

Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted a plan participant’s petition for a writ of certiorari in Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., No. 12-729, 2013 WL 1500233 (Apr. 15, 2013). The Court limited its review to a single question […]

Posted in ERISA Litigation, Health Plans, Legal Updates, Welfare Plans | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Eighth Circuit Clarifies the Scope of ERISA’s Application to Severance Arrangements

 The Eighth Circuit’s recent decision in Dakota, Minn. & E. R.R. Corp. v. Schieffer (Schieffer II), No. 12-1807, 2013 WL 1235235 (8th Cir. Mar. 28, 2013), offers new insight into the circumstances under which severance benefits provided under an executive’s […]

Posted in ERISA Litigation, Executive Compensation, Legal Updates | Tagged | Leave a comment